if you sell house you get only half back...

Also I don't really understand it anymore... what means 'idle'?

Quote from: alpha500delta on March 15, 2010, 08:36:49 PM
if you sell house you get only half back...

Also I don't really understand it anymore... what means 'idle'?

Ok ill try to describe it better. Ok an idle player is som1 who hasnt been on the server for months and really does next to nothing when they are on the server. Idle players can also be "has been" players. Players who used to always constantley be on the server and doing tons of stuff, but now they never go on. Now if they have a very nice house that other players wanna buy, in my opinion, thats not fair to other players when the owner of the house either quit the game, or hasnt been on in 3 or 4 months. Now what my suggestion would do, is every year or so, you will recieve a notice about you being kicked from your house. The notice will say something like this: In 3 days, you will be kicked from your house, if you want to keep your house, click Yes. If you do not, click NO. If you click yes, everything is normal, but either if you hit no, or dont answer the message and ignore it, you will be kicked from your house. Once you are kicked, you recieve your full euros you payed for the house. This would kick idle players from their houses and let other more active players get their own house. This is different than selling ur house

i Always thought of houses as places people bought and tried to get everyone to go into with "everyone go to /___"
that and a place i randomly saw when i fell off my bike and landed next to [insert  house words here..anyway players who are inactive because of tests or so will be unfair to them and making a player get on every 3 days or have a 50 - 60% of losing their house. i do think you can improve your idea but i wouldn't go for it -.-

Who knows maybe those hous owners wich arent playing on WoS may be back soon

Quote from: [RD]†ZealousR†™ on March 17, 2010, 05:01:24 PM
i Always thought of houses as places people bought and tried to get everyone to go into with "everyone go to /___"
that and a place i randomly saw when i fell off my bike and landed next to [insert  house words here..anyway players who are inactive because of tests or so will be unfair to them and making a player get on every 3 days or have a 50 - 60% of losing their house. i do think you can improve your idea but i wouldn't go for it -.-

oo, no its not like that. If you want to keep your house, you would only have to get on once a year. This house resest idea would only take place once a year. 3 days before people are kicked out of their house, they will get a notice. They would not have to get on every 3 days as this only takes place once a year

Quote from: [DRC]evilnine on March 17, 2010, 06:41:52 PM

Quote from: [RD]†ZealousR†™ on March 17, 2010, 05:01:24 PM
i Always thought of houses as places people bought and tried to get everyone to go into with "everyone go to /___"
that and a place i randomly saw when i fell off my bike and landed next to [insert  house words here..anyway players who are inactive because of tests or so will be unfair to them and making a player get on every 3 days or have a 50 - 60% of losing their house. i do think you can improve your idea but i wouldn't go for it -.-

oo, no its not like that. If you want to keep your house, you would only have to get on once a year. This house resest idea would only take place once a year. 3 days before people are kicked out of their house, they will get a notice. They would not have to get on every 3 days as this only takes place once a year

lol if someone gets a notice 3 days before disown he quickly gets on the server and like that you could own your house forever...

yes that is very true and i bet some people would do that. But i still think that a good percentage just quit permanently and another number of people wont even bother going on. So i bet 60% of idle players would still give up their houses

hm

Quote from: [DRC]evilnine on March 17, 2010, 06:41:52 PM

Quote from: [RD]†ZealousR†™ on March 17, 2010, 05:01:24 PM
i Always thought of houses as places people bought and tried to get everyone to go into with "everyone go to /___"
that and a place i randomly saw when i fell off my bike and landed next to [insert  house words here..anyway players who are inactive because of tests or so will be unfair to them and making a player get on every 3 days or have a 50 - 60% of losing their house. i do think you can improve your idea but i wouldn't go for it -.-

oo, no its not like that. If you want to keep your house, you would only have to get on once a year. This house resest idea would only take place once a year. 3 days before people are kicked out of their house, they will get a notice. They would not have to get on every 3 days as this only takes place once a year

Alright i see where you would be going with this. so as soon as they log on they will receive the notice and if they do not reply to it they'r house will be repoed?

pretty much but they will also recieve their full euros for the house back.

and what about banned people that want to keep their house? they can't just log on to make them stay with their house