World of Stunting
Forum Front Desk => Suggestions => Suggestions Archive => Topic started by: [DRC]evilnine on March 13, 2010, 09:17:04 pm
-
Ok i allready know alot of people are gonna hate this suggestion, but still read it anyway. I think that we should do a complete reset of player owned houses. This means that from now on and once every couple years, every person that owns a house would be kicked out of their house. But, you will get your full euros back, instead of just half if you sell it like it is now. This would hopefully get houses out of the hands of people who havent been on in awhile, and would give other players a chance for a decent house. or possibly, when it comes within 3 days of reseting, all players who own a house would be given a notice if they want to keep their house, and if you say yes, you will not be kicked. This way, you can still have ur house, or if you prefer, move to a nicer house that is for sale now due to AFK people being kicked.
sure this might be a bad suggestion, but atleast for a few people i think it would help
-
-
This sucks... theres lots of idle players so this is not good man
-
Sounds like a lot of work.
-
i guest Stumpy...
-
Sounds like a lot of work.
[/quote
-
Sounds like a lot of work.
[/quote
Interesting point you make there.
-
This sucks... theres lots of idle players so this is not good man
thats the point. i want to get houses out of the hands of idle players and give active people a chance for good houses
-
This sucks... theres lots of idle players so this is not good man
thats the point. i want to get houses out of the hands of idle players and give active people a chance for good houses
This was already suggested+not a good idea
-
This sucks... theres lots of idle players so this is not good man
thats the point. i want to get houses out of the hands of idle players and give active people a chance for good houses
This was already suggested+not a good idea
idk. I mean whats really the problem if idle players dont have houses. They dont go on anyway, and plus its not like they are loosing euros, cause u get the full ammount of euros back
-
if you sell house you get only half back...
Also I don't really understand it anymore... what means 'idle'?
-
if you sell house you get only half back...
Also I don't really understand it anymore... what means 'idle'?
Ok ill try to describe it better. Ok an idle player is som1 who hasnt been on the server for months and really does next to nothing when they are on the server. Idle players can also be "has been" players. Players who used to always constantley be on the server and doing tons of stuff, but now they never go on. Now if they have a very nice house that other players wanna buy, in my opinion, thats not fair to other players when the owner of the house either quit the game, or hasnt been on in 3 or 4 months. Now what my suggestion would do, is every year or so, you will recieve a notice about you being kicked from your house. The notice will say something like this: In 3 days, you will be kicked from your house, if you want to keep your house, click Yes. If you do not, click NO. If you click yes, everything is normal, but either if you hit no, or dont answer the message and ignore it, you will be kicked from your house. Once you are kicked, you recieve your full euros you payed for the house. This would kick idle players from their houses and let other more active players get their own house. This is different than selling ur house
-
i Always thought of houses as places people bought and tried to get everyone to go into with "everyone go to /___"
that and a place i randomly saw when i fell off my bike and landed next to [insert house words here..anyway players who are inactive because of tests or so will be unfair to them and making a player get on every 3 days or have a 50 - 60% of losing their house. i do think you can improve your idea but i wouldn't go for it -.-
-
Who knows maybe those hous owners wich arent playing on WoS may be back soon
-
-
-
yes that is very true and i bet some people would do that. But i still think that a good percentage just quit permanently and another number of people wont even bother going on. So i bet 60% of idle players would still give up their houses
-
-
pretty much but they will also recieve their full euros for the house back.
-
and what about banned people that want to keep their house? they can't just log on to make them stay with their house
-
-
-
and what about banned people that want to keep their house? they can't just log on to make them stay with their house
It's their fault for breaking the rules in the first place, so I think they don't deserve any special treatment.
-
Well, exactly. I propose this:
If you're banned, you have X amount of time before getting unbanned. If not your house just gets reset, no money back, nothing.
I think that could clear out 3/4 of the houses right now, and after all, they are banned, so who cares?
-
they are banned, so who cares?
ho ho ho man "who cares" i bet if your on the losing side of that your gonna be asking "who cares".
in my opinion that's ignorant to say. people are banned because they broke a rule, which means they made a mistake. a mistake shouldn't always have to cause you all of your possessions and money because you might get a second chance. ban appeals are there to get second chances after a mistake or offense and if their internet gets out or they have exams or a bunch of reasons but that again doesn't mean a "who cares" attitude.
If admins had a "who cares" attitude and you got banned...who cares? me? no, i get your house, you lose your money. and nobody cares about "Orion" the dude who got banned and lost all his stuff. eventually people get unbanned and wanna get in-game again, banned people aren't officially convicts, or dangerous or always hackers or rule-breakers, some learn their lessons, some become better people, or maybe some break the rules again and get a harsher punishments, its just alienating them by saying "who cares"
Anyway there can be a better way on this whole house time suggestion but in my eyes this would be completely messed up.
And i don't mean to call you out or sound like a douche or a jerk or give a bad first impression of me but it just kind of annoyed me when that was said.
gday mate :)
-
Oh well. Never consider things out of their context. Maybe you would realise my proposition is totally opened to ban appeal, and the time from wich you may consider someone as permanently banned/unactive is totally subjective.
I understand what have angerstd you is that I have said "who cares". I personally think if MR_X has been unactive and banned from June 2009 because he was spotted flying in his truck and has not done a ban appeal a year later, then yeah "Who cares" about him.
If you are banned and you do not want to loose your property, make a ban appeal. That's my point exactly.
In any case, I don't feel like arguing over the form(or words i choose) instead of the actual content of my post.
I think the whole point of banning IS alienation.
-
Oh well. Never consider things out of their context. Maybe you would realise my proposition is totally opened to ban appeal, and the time from wich you may consider someone as permanently banned/unactive is totally subjective.
I understand what have angerstd you is that I have said "who cares". I personally think if MR_X has been unactive and banned from June 2009 because he was spotted flying in his truck and has not done a ban appeal a year later, then yeah "Who cares" about him.
If you are banned and you do not want to loose your property, make a ban appeal. That's my point exactly.
In any case, I don't feel like arguing over the form(or words i choose) instead of the actual content of my post.
I think the whole point of banning IS alienation.
i see no way that your text is open to ban appeals if you say who cares.
ok if they were banned since 09 then their house would be reset anyway, its already setup like that
i was not angered in anyway i just thought i should stand up for those who are banned or have been banned
in which way is this an argument? i didn't insult you i was just stating my point
Ok again: being banned means you made a mistake, if it was meant to alienate then you could not even talk on the forums, it is a form of punishment to learn your lesson and not do the same thing. if it was meant to alienate they would put, "do not converse with MR.X because they are banned and that means they are likely to do this offense again." somewhere on the forums.
last but not least if the person has been banned for a year then yes i could agree that would be a better way to...repossess their house since they won't be on for a year.
-
....... What are you talking about?
-
-
lol we have 2 kind of different kinds of "alienation"
if you would check ban appeals some people have added mods that they didnt know went against the ToS and would remove it immediately. not saying every banned client is like this but SOME are.
privilege is real word - which you spelled correctly
yes this wouldnt really matter till june but i stand by the certain conditions of a banned client concerning their repossession or not.
this has been an enjoyable conversation :)