Quote from: RazorX on June 29, 2011, 12:38:03 PM
Lol we have the ''Original 9'' ? 

First I've heard of it too

I didn't realise it'd been three years already that you've been gone enzo

Quote from: Cream on June 09, 2011, 08:09:47 PM
Same here.

Instead of making a shitload of topics, I advise it's better to just carry on from one.

I agree, so I've merged the two topics.

If you find multiple videos of a similar nature (in this case, pranks) in a short span of time, post them in the same topic, thanks.

Got to say, I love the drunk prank, no idea what I'd do if I woke up floating in a lake

I must ask, what makes you think that eXpie is doing worse than Rymich? I'd love to hear your opinions and concerns so that these can be addressed. Feel free to say your true opinion, it is best to truly say what you believe and I will do everything in my power to see these concerns addressed. I will not punish you for anything you say in reply to this and if you fear someone else will, feel free to PM me with your response.

To comment on the idea of the server being dead simply because the stuntwars are not working correctly. Personally I do agree that we are getting less players because it's not complete, I do not feel that this is killing the server. Like Max and Brendon have stated before me, many of us only come onto the server for the community, not for any of the features that the server offers.

Do you have the latest version of SA:MP? 0.3c R3

That's the first time I've ever heard of someone putting a photo on a CV apart from those going into acting/modeling.  Generally every hints/tips information about a CV I've ever read has discouraged the act of using a photo and after speaking to people I know in recruitment, they think it's a bad idea unless the recruiter specifically asks for one.

Whatever floats you boat, I suppose

Good photo of you, but a CV photo? Nobody puts their photo on a CV

Quote from: Stuffy on May 04, 2011, 09:40:59 AM
Awesome skin, but can't download it anymore...

To be fair, it was released three years ago, I'd be surprised if he still had the files

It's in the right section now, welcome back Xion

Quote from: PaTt on April 19, 2011, 01:03:48 AM
I didn't post any youtube link anywhere that got me banned, it was a different site. I don't care if i'm banned I just want a clear explanation of why this is even a rule when you allow certain sites to be advertised anyway.

Allow me, this rule has always been here.

What difference does it make even depending on the site?
There have always been supported sites, namely those that are purely informative or contain simple videos.

What profits will you lose from advertising?
Profit does not come into the equation when making rules.

What honest difference does it make?
Advertising reduces players. If people were allowed to freely advertise we would have less players.

How does it affect the server?
I'll use this question to elaborate on my answer to the previous question. Word of mouth from trusted sources is everything to many people. If regulars suddenly decided they didn't like the server anymore and started to join the server purely to say "This server sucks, come to server x at y.y.y.y instead!", people would follow them and leave the server, reducing our player-base. As players see regulars leaving, that would reduce the player-base even more. A reduced player-base results in new players not giving the server a chance as they view the community as dying. In this example, server is interchangeable with website.

How does it change it from what it is today?
The server will become less popular, possibly leading to it's death.

How the hell can you lose anyone or anything from it?
See above. Player-base.

How does it affect the scripting of the server?
It doesn't I don't understand the relevance of this question.

How does it affect you personally?
It's rude. To go onto a server/website people have spent so much of their time and effort on only to tell people to go somewhere else is incredibly rude. However, this is obviously not the main reason for the rule being there.

Any further questions?

It would seem the site already worked on many mobile browsers, as shown in the posts above. It may just be the PSP browser that doesn't work correctly with the site.