October 31, 2024, 04:37:21 pm

Author Topic: 3 Hackers report.  (Read 12236 times)

Offline SampStunta

  • Wiseguy
  • ***
  • Posts: 82
  • Reputation: +2/-3
    • View Profile
    • Email
  • Xfire: SampStunta
3 Hackers report.
« on: December 15, 2010, 09:29:08 pm »
Your ingame name: [PSS]SampStunta
Rule breaker ingame name: edisongacer12, Akashi_Takahasi, vincent71234
Reason for reporting: They all were hacking together. Airbreak, weapon hacks and more.
ScreenShot/Video:I did not have time to take a video or screenshot since they saw me and ran away from me using airbreak and turned them off shortly after to avoid being caught. But I do have proof, Pimper aka Tyga was there with me and they saw them hacking also
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 09:30:56 pm by SampStunta »

Offline idontwannaname

  • Made person
  • ****
  • Posts: 102
  • Reputation: +6/-14
  • meow?
    • MSN Messenger - idontwannaname@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2010, 09:45:24 pm »
Don't worry, I caught this from live.



He admited it, so punish away mods.
If you see a big ass bright red fire engine with the lights flashing and siren going, why must you insist on RAMMING it?!?

Offline Mike069

  • Server Administrator
  • Wiseguy
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Reputation: +2/-2
    • View Profile
    • Email
  • Xfire: mike069sx
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2010, 02:28:12 am »
 This evidence is insufficient and unclear, therefore we cannot do anything. Administrators will be keeping a close eye on these players to make sure they are following the rules. To be able to take action Administrators must have Clear evidence. Pictures aren't always clear enough to make judgment for example a picture of chat may be useful if the rule breaker CLEARLY admits to breaking the rules.

Regards
- Mike069 -
« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 03:04:05 am by Mike069 »

Offline SampStunta

  • Wiseguy
  • ***
  • Posts: 82
  • Reputation: +2/-3
    • View Profile
    • Email
  • Xfire: SampStunta
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2010, 05:47:30 am »

Offline GNGification

  • Server Administrator
  • Capo
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Reputation: +7/-4
    • MSN Messenger - EliasHaaralahti@netti.fi
    • View Profile
    • Email
  • Steam: GNGification
  • Xfire: gngification
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2010, 07:23:44 am »
Yes, thats hacking BUT this video quality is to bad to see the name...
Also, you said you didn't had ''TIME'' to get the screenshot or video so how you made this?

Offline SampStunta

  • Wiseguy
  • ***
  • Posts: 82
  • Reputation: +2/-3
    • View Profile
    • Email
  • Xfire: SampStunta
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2010, 07:29:21 am »
I saw that one of the hackers came back online so I quick went inside the server and recorded this.
The name is vincent71234

Offline idontwannaname

  • Made person
  • ****
  • Posts: 102
  • Reputation: +6/-14
  • meow?
    • MSN Messenger - idontwannaname@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2010, 10:20:13 am »
I think from my screenshot of live showing names, and of the film, you can tell it's vincent. And the fact when told to delete his hacks, he said "no" and not "I don't have hacks" shows he has them, and really doesn't care about us, or the server.
If you see a big ass bright red fire engine with the lights flashing and siren going, why must you insist on RAMMING it?!?

Offline Nka19

  • Owner
  • Godfather
  • ********
  • Posts: 2180
  • Reputation: +88/-17
  • Administrator of World Of Stunting
    • MSN Messenger - Ask_for_it@and_I_might_give_it_to.you
    • View Profile
  • Steam: nka17
  • Xfire: nka17
Re: 3 Hackers report.
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2010, 11:37:54 am »
I think from my screenshot of live showing names, and of the film, you can tell it's vincent. And the fact when told to delete his hacks, he said "no" and not "I don't have hacks" shows he has them, and really doesn't care about us, or the server.
That's true but we simply do not ban without a totally clear evidence. Even if we're 99% sure of something we do not ban if there's a 1% chance that we could be wrong. It's just the way we work I hope you understand.
And about the part where he says "no" he could of been telling that to Patt as well. He should been saying "no, I won't" at least.
Anyways we'll sure be looking out for that player and watch him very closely.