World of Stunting

Off-Topic => Everything and Anything => Topic started by: macress345 on October 31, 2009, 11:05:28 pm

Title: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on October 31, 2009, 11:05:28 pm
Pure awesomeness.

This is how games are going to start looking in 2010.

ati radeon hd 5870 DIRECTX 10 VS DIRECTX 11, see the differance for your self (NEW HD) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PR40GwRtFyw&feature=related#)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Jubito on November 01, 2009, 12:31:33 am
:OOOO
Amazing.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Nka19 on November 01, 2009, 01:43:24 am
omg awesome :D. Can't wait for it really! B)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 01, 2009, 03:38:05 am
ima get a directx 11 card o.o
and leave my 8800gts deal with the physics >:)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 04, 2009, 03:38:07 pm
Horrible, truely, this is just ruining the industry of what gaming was built on, fun.

I honestly don't see how looking at games is fun, I thought the point was to actually play it..hence, gaming.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 04, 2009, 04:12:12 pm
Horrible, truely, this is just ruining the industry of what gaming was built on, fun.

I honestly don't see how looking at games is fun, I thought the point was to actually play it..hence, gaming.

I agree and disagree. Some games wouldn't be very fun at all if they looked like games from the late 90's.(Call of Duty, Gran Turismo/Forza, etc) But I do agree though that some developers are making games just to show off graphics (Crysis) and its ruining peoples perspective of what a good game really is.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 04, 2009, 04:17:14 pm
Horrible, truely, this is just ruining the industry of what gaming was built on, fun.

I honestly don't see how looking at games is fun, I thought the point was to actually play it..hence, gaming.

I agree and disagree. Some games wouldn't be very fun at all if they looked like games from the late 90's.(Call of Duty, Gran Turismo/Forza, etc) But I do agree though that some developers are making games just to show off graphics (Crysis) and its ruining peoples perspective of what a good game really is.
The only games that I'd like to look nice are racing games.

I don't see the point personally in doing it to any other games that are supposed to be fun and not realistic. It just doesn't seem to fit.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 04, 2009, 04:24:06 pm
Horrible, truely, this is just ruining the industry of what gaming was built on, fun.

I honestly don't see how looking at games is fun, I thought the point was to actually play it..hence, gaming.

I agree and disagree. Some games wouldn't be very fun at all if they looked like games from the late 90's.(Call of Duty, Gran Turismo/Forza, etc) But I do agree though that some developers are making games just to show off graphics (Crysis) and its ruining peoples perspective of what a good game really is.
The only games that I'd like to look nice are racing games.

I don't see the point personally in doing it to any other games that are supposed to be fun and not realistic. It just doesn't seem to fit.

I agree with ya on that too. Simulation games/Realism based games like Arma 2 are great with good graphics because the point of them is... well realism of course. Games like GTA4, Crysis, and Far Cry 2 really don't need the visuals they have. DirectX 11's tessellation will really help add details to cars in racing sims and add the ability to have unique looking buildings and weapons in FPS sims to help immerse you into the game more.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 04, 2009, 06:28:55 pm
Horrible, truely, this is just ruining the industry of what gaming was built on, fun.

I honestly don't see how looking at games is fun, I thought the point was to actually play it..hence, gaming.

I agree and disagree. Some games wouldn't be very fun at all if they looked like games from the late 90's.(Call of Duty, Gran Turismo/Forza, etc) But I do agree though that some developers are making games just to show off graphics (Crysis) and its ruining peoples perspective of what a good game really is.
The only games that I'd like to look nice are racing games.

I don't see the point personally in doing it to any other games that are supposed to be fun and not realistic. It just doesn't seem to fit.

I agree with ya on that too. Simulation games/Realism based games like Arma 2 are great with good graphics because the point of them is... well realism of course. Games like GTA4, Crysis, and Far Cry 2 really don't need the visuals they have. DirectX 11's tessellation will really help add details to cars in racing sims and add the ability to have unique looking buildings and weapons in FPS sims to help immerse you into the game more.

Honestly, i thought i was the only one left in the world that actually just played video games for the GAME and not the graphics, my Favorite game is STILL Mario kart i care not for graphics, sure its a nice add on but its not EVERYTHING, and if you think about it some times you get distracted from the game it screws you over because your paying attention to the graphics and not the GAME.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 05, 2009, 06:44:44 am
whoever plays a game for its looks, obviously doesnt play on WoS servers :P
my opinion is
why not make a game look better if you can? (this can be disagreed on)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 05, 2009, 06:51:25 am
whoever plays a game for its looks, obviously doesnt play on WoS servers :P
my opinion is
why not make a game look better if you can? (this can be disagreed on)
Because then there's no memory on the disc left for gameplay. So it's just an interactive movie.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Zencal on November 05, 2009, 08:57:48 am
Because then there's no memory on the disc left for gameplay. So it's just an interactive movie.

Metal Gear Solid 4 much? :)

I have no problem with games looking as realistic as possible, but it depends on the game. For example, I think GTA games shouldn't have become realistic graphically, whereas a realistic appearance suits a game like Battlefield.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 06, 2009, 06:15:36 pm
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RazorX on November 07, 2009, 02:48:42 am
I have Mario Kart, top 3 of world  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 07, 2009, 12:44:33 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 07, 2009, 06:31:31 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 07, 2009, 07:41:20 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .

Whatya mean its gonna be made with Macromedia Flash? Are you talking about the graphics in the game? If so "/me slaps Raising."
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 08, 2009, 07:56:29 am
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .

Whatya mean its gonna be made with Macromedia Flash? Are you talking about the graphics in the game? If so "/me slaps Raising."
No stumpy , the editor from old MF are going to help Editors from Dirt2 (that was what a portuguese magazine said)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 08, 2009, 01:12:10 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .

Whatya mean its gonna be made with Macromedia Flash? Are you talking about the graphics in the game? If so "/me slaps Raising."
No stumpy , the editor from old MF are going to help Editors from Dirt2 (that was what a portuguese magazine said)

Oh, you meant programmers. Well whatever gets the job done I guess. Hopefully it doesn't turn out like when Crytek bought out Activision and they made a bad game (Modern Warfare 2).
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 08, 2009, 01:24:55 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .

Whatya mean its gonna be made with Macromedia Flash? Are you talking about the graphics in the game? If so "/me slaps Raising."
No stumpy , the editor from old MF are going to help Editors from Dirt2 (that was what a portuguese magazine said)

Oh, you meant programmers. Well whatever gets the job done I guess. Hopefully it doesn't turn out like when Crytek bought out Activision and they made a bad game (Modern Warfare 2).
Modern Warfare 2...lol @ P2P multiplayer, what epic failure of a game.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 08, 2009, 04:01:54 pm
Anyways..... back on topic. DiRT 2 will be released on PC this December with DX 11 so we will see then what it really looks like in a game (assuming we all have Direct X 11 video cards to play with).
Yes but rumors say it will be made with the help of Macromedia Flash programs .

Whatya mean its gonna be made with Macromedia Flash? Are you talking about the graphics in the game? If so "/me slaps Raising."
No stumpy , the editor from old MF are going to help Editors from Dirt2 (that was what a portuguese magazine said)

Oh, you meant programmers. Well whatever gets the job done I guess. Hopefully it doesn't turn out like when Crytek bought out Activision and they made a bad game (Modern Warfare 2).
Modern Warfare 2...lol @ P2P multiplayer, what epic failure of a game.
its not CoD right? :\
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 08, 2009, 04:09:19 pm
CoD:MW2 = Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
OFC ITS COD
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 08, 2009, 04:14:24 pm
CoD:MW2 = Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
OFC ITS COD

Good because Modern Warfare is taking the point of CoD : World war 1 and 2.
:s
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 08, 2009, 06:08:45 pm
i HATE COD,
CoD:MW2 = Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
OFC ITS COD

Good because Modern Warfare is taking the point of CoD : World war 1 and 2.
:s
i HATE COD, i know its a good FPS but seriously..i honestly don't understand why 4 5ths of my school love it so damn much, can anyone run this through with me?
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 08, 2009, 06:23:53 pm
i HATE COD,
CoD:MW2 = Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
OFC ITS COD

Good because Modern Warfare is taking the point of CoD : World war 1 and 2.
:s
i HATE COD, i know its a good FPS but seriously..i honestly don't understand why 4 5ths of my school love it so damn much, can anyone run this through with me?
its an awesome game, with good reputation. others arent just popular, but that doesnt mean others arent as good. and cod offers just a lot of awesome stuff, its not too easy nor too hard for anyone. it usually has a great story ,allso:P
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 09, 2009, 02:17:19 pm
CoD is the best WW1 and WW2 simulator?
Its like 100/20
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 09, 2009, 02:20:16 pm
CoD is the best WW1 and WW2 simulator?
Its like 100/20
I'd hardly call it a simulator there mate...it's seriously unrealistic.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 10, 2009, 07:43:19 am
lol @ calling it a simulator

come on, getting healed over time? -.-
the autoheal is not on only when playing on expert mode
and umm
do u have a crosshair irl?  :lol:
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 10, 2009, 12:50:46 pm
i HATE COD,
CoD:MW2 = Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
OFC ITS COD

Good because Modern Warfare is taking the point of CoD : World war 1 and 2.
:s
i HATE COD, i know its a good FPS but seriously..i honestly don't understand why 4 5ths of my school love it so damn much, can anyone run this through with me?
its an awesome game, with good reputation. others arent just popular, but that doesnt mean others arent as good. and cod offers just a lot of awesome stuff, its not too easy nor too hard for anyone. it usually has a great story ,allso:P

Mk thanks, i know its got good Rep, thats one reason why most love it, i know it's a good game but i'm not into war games like i used to be. its just not as fun when you don't have LIVE to play it, while you listen to Marilyn Manson FTW
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 10, 2009, 12:54:57 pm
call of duty games have multiplayer -.-
they even made separate icons on the desktop for multiplayer and single player
and LIVE on every game = pointless
BTW
Xbox 360 + Call of Duty = LIVE
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 10, 2009, 03:05:53 pm
call of duty games have multiplayer -.-
they even made separate icons on the desktop for multiplayer and single player
and LIVE on every game = pointless
BTW
Xbox 360 + Call of Duty = LIVE
That makes loads of sense. You are intelligent by miles.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 10, 2009, 04:09:14 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 10, 2009, 04:28:29 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
soap?
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 10, 2009, 07:10:12 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
soap?

Soap MacTavish.... he's the SAS character you play as in the first one.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 10, 2009, 10:20:47 pm
call of duty games have multiplayer -.-
they even made separate icons on the desktop for multiplayer and single player
and LIVE on every game = pointless
BTW
Xbox 360 + Call of Duty = LIVE
That makes loads of sense. You are intelligent by miles.
Sorry, i was sleepy at that time.
BTW, ive heard rumours that Captain Price didnt really die, is that true?
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 11, 2009, 12:14:10 pm
call of duty games have multiplayer -.-
they even made separate icons on the desktop for multiplayer and single player
and LIVE on every game = pointless
BTW
Xbox 360 + Call of Duty = LIVE
That makes loads of sense. You are intelligent by miles.
Sorry, i was sleepy at that time.
BTW, ive heard rumours that Captain Price didnt really die, is that true?
Yes he will be back with a Mohawk and with a scar in his face -
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 11, 2009, 12:40:08 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
soap?

Soap MacTavish.... he's the SAS character you play as in the first one.
tnx for clearing that up for me :D
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 11, 2009, 01:47:00 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
soap?

Soap MacTavish.... he's the SAS character you play as in the first one.
tnx for clearing that up for me :D
No problem just ask (:
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 11, 2009, 02:21:19 pm
call of duty games have multiplayer -.-
they even made separate icons on the desktop for multiplayer and single player
and LIVE on every game = pointless
BTW
Xbox 360 + Call of Duty = LIVE
That makes loads of sense. You are intelligent by miles.
Sorry, i was sleepy at that time.
BTW, ive heard rumours that Captain Price didnt really die, is that true?
Yes he will be back with a Mohawk and with a scar in his face -
the guy with the mohawk is soap
captain price is alive
just saved him =)
Modern warfare 2 is awesome!!! =)
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Nka19 on November 11, 2009, 02:49:34 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
Already beaten the game :D. It's great! I just love that there are a lot of types of missions (Snow, underwater, sand, etc.) B). I think due to ending MW3 might come out next year.
Also ending it's like from from the first game when you're almost dead and you need to kill the Makarov with a gun. Only this time is different place, different guy and different weapon :P.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: RaisingTugas on November 11, 2009, 03:47:03 pm
Nice Nka
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 11, 2009, 05:38:18 pm
I finished it, singleplayer is good, multiplayer is bad.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 11, 2009, 09:38:37 pm
finished already? either its a short game or u nolifed
i played it for 4-5 hours yesterday.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Rikimaru on November 11, 2009, 10:08:55 pm
I just played the first 2 missions on MW2 and I gotta say the Single Player is actually not that bad. You get to actually see and hear Soap now :lol:. There was talk of that mission with you killing civilians inside an airport and I can really see why it might be offensive, you walk right into the airport and just start shooting hundreds of innocent civilians and its mass chaos, I was even hesitant to open fire on them but after a while your "evil side" takes over and you start to enjoy it. Overall its definitely improved over the first MW although I can't say much about Multi-Player.
Already beaten the game :D. It's great! I just love that there are a lot of types of missions (Snow, underwater, sand, etc.) B). I think due to ending MW3 might come out next year.
Also ending it's like from from the first game when you're almost dead and you need to kill the Makarov with a gun. Only this time is different place, different guy and different weapon :P.

Spoiler..ftw xD
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 12, 2009, 03:17:50 am
I finished it in a 8-9 hour session.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: macress345 on November 12, 2009, 03:54:41 am
I played the Single player for an hour then played Multiplayer for 2 matches and went straight back to the Single Player. The MP is exactly like the first but with new weapons and levels and not worth the time.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Nka19 on November 12, 2009, 04:33:04 am
I finished it in a 8-9 hour session.
Me in 7 :). The normal difficulty. Now I'll go again and do it with the hardest one.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: X on November 12, 2009, 11:16:53 am
I played the Single player for an hour then played Multiplayer for 2 matches and went straight back to the Single Player. The MP is exactly like the first but with new weapons and levels and not worth the time.
And that it's P2P so it's just horrible.
Title: Re: DirectX 10 vs DirectX 11
Post by: Muki on November 12, 2009, 11:33:04 am
I finished it in a 8-9 hour session.
just finished it, played 5-6 hours yesterday and 2-3 today :P